ABCC1 Antibody
- Known as:
- ABCC1 Antibody
- Catalog number:
- AF1009a
- Product Quantity:
- 0.1mg
- Category:
- -
- Supplier:
- Abgen
- Gene target:
- ABCC1 Antibody
Related genes to: ABCC1 Antibody
- Gene:
- ABCC1 NIH gene
- Name:
- ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1
- Previous symbol:
- MRP, MRP1
- Synonyms:
- GS-X
- Chromosome:
- 16p13.11
- Locus Type:
- gene with protein product
- Date approved:
- 1993-06-29
- Date modifiied:
- 2018-05-03
- Gene:
- ABCC13 NIH gene
- Name:
- ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 13 (pseudogene)
- Previous symbol:
- -
- Synonyms:
- PRED6, C21orf73, ABCC13P
- Chromosome:
- 21q11.2
- Locus Type:
- pseudogene
- Date approved:
- 2002-11-11
- Date modifiied:
- 2018-10-17
Related products to: ABCC1 Antibody
Related articles to: ABCC1 Antibody
- Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumors in adults. Patients invariably relapse during or after first-line therapy and the median overall survival is 14.6 months. Such poor clinical response is partly ascribed to the activity of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. The activity of these proteins, severely reduces the amount of therapeutics that penetrates the tumor cells. We hypothesized that ABC transporter expression could correlate with survival surrogates. In this study, we assessed the expression of four commonly expressed ABC transporters in GBM samples and investigated if mRNA levels could serve as a prognostic biomarker. - Source: PubMed
Publication date: 2022/11/07
Roy Laurent-OlivierLemelin MyriamBlanchette MariePoirier Marie-BelleAldakhil SalmanFortin David - Aberrant expression of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily C (ABCC), one of the largest superfamilies and transporter gene families of membrane proteins, is associated with various tumors. However, its relationship with liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) remains unclear.We used the Oncomine, UALCAN, Human Protein Atlas, GeneMANIA, GO, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), TIMER, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter databases. On May 20, 2021, we searched these databases for the terms ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC3, ABCC4, ABCC5, ABCC6, ABCC7, ABCC8, ABCC9, ABCC10, ABCC11, ABCC12, ABCC13, and "liver cancer." The exposure group comprised LIHC patients, and the control group comprised normal patients (those with noncancerous liver tissue). All patients shown in the retrieval language search were included. We compared the mRNA expression of these proteins in LIHC and control patients to examine the potential role of ABCC1-13 in LIHC.Relative to the normal liver tissue, mRNA expression of ABCC1/2/3/4/5/6/10 was significantly upregulated (P < .001), and that of ABCC9/11 significantly downregulated (both P < .001), in LIHC. ABCC mRNA expression varied with gender (P < .05), except for ABCC11-13; with tumor grade (P < 0.05), except for ABCC7/12/13; with tumor stage (P < .05), except for ABCC11-13; and with lymph node metastasis status (P < .05), except for ABCC7/8/11/12/13. Based on KEGG enrichment analysis, these genes were associated with the following pathways: ABC transporters, Bile secretion, Antifolate resistance, and Peroxisome (P < .05). Except for ABCC12/13, the ABCCs were significantly associated with B cell, CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, macrophage, neutrophil, and dendritic cell infiltration (P < .05). High mRNA expression of ABCC1/4/5/8 (P < .05) and low expression of ABCC6/7/9/12/13 (P < .05) indicated poor prognosis. Prognostic significance was indicated for ABCC2/13 for both men and women (P < .05); for ABCC1/6/12/13 for tumor grades 1-3 (P < .05); for ABCC5/11/12/13 for all tumor stages (P < .05); for ABCC1/11/12/13 for American Joint Committee on Cancer T stages 1-3 (P < .05); and for ABCC1/5/6/13 for vascular invasion. None showed prognostic significance for microvascular invasion (P < .05).We identified ABCC1/2/3/4/5/6/9/10/11 as potential diagnostic markers, and ABCC1/4/5/6/7/8/9/12/13 as prognostic markers, of LIHC. Our future work will promote the use of ABCCs in the diagnosis and treatment of LIHC. - Source: PubMed
Meng XiangtongDong ShenYangyang LiuWang SongXu XiaohaoLiu TiejunZhuang Xiong - Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a lethal malignancy worldwide and a major public health concern. We explored the potential clinical significance for LUAD of ATP-binding cassette (ABC), sub-family C, consisting of ABCC1-6, 8-12, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR).Five hundred LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were used for analysis, including differential expression and diagnostic and prognostic significance. Oncomine and MERAV databases were used to validate differential expression and diagnostic significance. A risk score model was constructed using prognosis-related ABCC members. Prognosis-related genes were further explored to correlate their expression with tumor stage progression. Interaction networks, including biological processes and metabolic pathways, were constructed using Cytoscape software and STRING website.ABCC1-3 consistently showed high expression in tumor tissues (all P ≤ 0.05). Most datasets indicated that ABCC5, 10, and 11 were highly expressed in tumor tissues whereas ABCC6, 9, and CFTR were highly expressed in nontumor tissues (all P ≤ 0.05). Diagnostic significance of ABCC3 and ABCC5 was consistently assessed and validated in three datasets (all area under the curve > 0.700) whereas ABCC6, 8, 10, 11, and CFTR were assessed in The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and validated in one dataset (all area under the curve > 0.700). Prognostic analysis indicated that ABCC2, 6, and 8 mRNA expression was associated with survival of LUAD (all adjusted P ≤ .037). The risk score model constructed using ABCC2, 6, and 8 suggested prognostic significance for survival predictions. ABCC2 expression was associated with tumor stage, whereas ABCC6 and 8 were not. Interaction networks indicated that they were involved in establishment of localization, ion transport, plasma membrane, apical plasma membrane, adenylyl nucleotide binding, ABC transporters, ABC transporter disorders, ABC-family-protein-mediated transport, and bile secretion.Differentially expressed ABCC2 and ABCC5 might be diagnostic whereas ABCC2, 6, and 8 may be prognostic biomarkers for LUAD, possibly through ABC-family-mediated transporter disorders. - Source: PubMed
Zhang LinboHuang PingHuang ChunxiaJiang LingmeiLu ZhijieWang Peng - Doxorubicin (DOX), one of the most effective anticancer drugs, acts in a variety of ways including DNA damage, enzyme inhibition and generation of reactive oxygen species. Glutathione (GSH) and glutathione-related enzymes including: glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GSR) and glutathione S-transferases (GST) may play a role in adaptive detoxification processes in response to the oxidative stress, thus contributing to drug resistance phenotype. In this study, we investigated effects of DOX treatment on expression and activity of GSH-related enzymes and multidrug resistance-associated proteins in cultured human cervical cancer cells displaying different resistance against this drug (HeLa and KB-V1). Determination of expression level of genes encoding GST isoforms and MRP proteins (GCS, GPX, GSR, GSTA1-3, GSTM1, GSTP1, ABCC1-3, MGST1-3) was performed using StellARray™ Technology. Enzymatic activities of GPX and GSR were measured using biochemical methods. Expression of MRP1 was examined by immunofluorescence microscopy. This study showed that native expression levels of GSTM1 and GSTA3 were markedly higher in KB-V1 cells (2000-fold and 200-fold) compared to HeLa cells. Resistant cells have also shown significantly elevated expression of GSTA1 and GSTA2 genes (200-fold and 50-fold) as a result of DOX treatment. In HeLa cells, exposure to DOX increased expression of all genes: GSTM1 (7-fold) and GSTA1-3 (550-fold, 150-fold and 300-fold). Exposure to DOX led to the slight increase of GCS expression as well as GPX activity in KB-V1 cells, while in HeLa cells it did not. Expression of ABCC1 (MRP1) was not increased in any of the tested cell lines. Our results indicate that expression of GSTM1 and GSTA1-3 genes is up-regulated by DOX treatment and suggest that activity of these genes may be associated with drug resistance of the tested cells. At the same time, involvement of MRP1 in DOX resistance in the given experimental conditions is unlikely. - Source: PubMed
Publication date: 2016/07/15
Drozd EwaKrzysztoń-Russjan JolantaMarczewska JadwigaDrozd JaninaBubko IrenaBielak MagdaLubelska KatarzynaWiktorska KatarzynaChilmonczyk ZdzisławAnuszewska ElżbietaGruber-Bzura Beata - The water flea Daphnia magna is widely used as test species in ecotoxicological bioassays. So far, there is no information available to which extent ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter based multixenobiotic resistance (MXR) counteracts adverse chemical effects in this species. This, however, would be important for assessing to which extent the bio-active potential of a compound determined with this species depends on this cellular defense. We here present molecular, functional and toxicological studies that provide first evidence for ABC transporter-based MXR in D. magna. We cloned putatively MXR-related partial abcb1, abcc1/3, abcc4 and abcc5 coding sequences; respective transcripts were constitutively expressed in different D. magna life stages. MXR associated efflux activity was monitored in D. magna using the fluorescent substrate dyes rhodamine 123, rhodamine B and calcein-AM combined with inhibitors of human ABCB1 and/or ABCC transporter activities reversin 205, MK571 and cyclosporin A. With inhibitors present, efflux of dye substrates was reduced in D. magna in a concentration-dependent mode, as indicated by elevated accumulation of the dyes in D. magna tissues. In animals pre-exposed to mercury, pentachlorophenol or dacthal applied as inducers of ABC transporter expression, levels of some ABC transporter transcripts were increased in some cases showing that these genes can be chemically induced. Likewise, pre-exposure of animals to these chemicals decreased dye accumulation in tissue, indicating enhanced MXR transporter activity, likely associated with higher transporter protein levels. Toxicity assays with toxic transporter substrates mitoxantrone and chlorambucil that were applied singly and in combination with inhibitors were performed to study the tolerance role of Abcb1 and Abcc efflux transporters in D. magna. Joint toxicities of about half of the binary combinations of test compounds applied (substrate/inhibitor, substrate/substrate, inhibitor/inhibitor) were greater than joint effects predicted with mixture toxicity models, which can be explained by chemosensitization through MXR efflux transporter interference. Our data indicate the presence of an MXR efflux system in D. magna. It needs to be considered when assessing the bioactive potential of test compounds with this species. Further, chemosensitization may explain joint toxicities of compound mixtures to D. magna that are higher than expected. - Source: PubMed
Publication date: 2014/01/11
Campos BrunoAltenburger RolfGómez CristianLacorte SilviaPiña BenjaminBarata CarlosLuckenbach Till