RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free

Price:
638 EUR
765 USD
529 GBP
known as: RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free
Catalog number: genta-ABS0354
Product Quantity: 1 mg
Category:
Supplier: AbD

   CAPTCHA Image   Reload Image

Gene target: interleukin 2

Related genes to: RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free

Related Pathways to: RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free

Related product to: RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free

Related Articles about: RABBIT ANTI HUMAN INTERLEUKIN_2 Azide Free

Uncovering the decision-making work of transferring dying patients home from critical care units: An integrative review.

To understand how decisions are made to transfer dying patients home from critical care units. - Source :PubMed

European diabetes research and its funding, 2002-2013.

This study examined the outputs of research papers in diabetes from 31 European countries between 2002 and 2013, and their funding. - Source :PubMed

Fundamental motor skills: A systematic review of terminology.

The three aims of this systematic review are to describe: (1) use of the term fundamental motor/movement skills (FMS) in published articles; (2) the quality of definitions; and (3) relative use of process- and product- oriented assessments to measure FMS. The inclusion criteria included: (a) peer-reviewed article, (b) printed in English, (c) published between January 2000 and 31 December 2015, (d) presence of either the term "fundamental motor or movement skill" in the title and/or abstract, and (e) FMS were a measured outcome. There has been an increase in the number of publications on FMS in recent years, with the majority of studies conducted in Australia (n = 41, 33%). Approximately 24% of studies (n = 30) did not provide any explicit definition of FMS. A majority of studies reported the use of process-oriented measures (n = 98, 79%) compared to product-oriented measures (n = 23, 19%), and few studies used both (n = 6, 5%). We recommend that researchers provide: (1) an operational definition of FMS that states FMS are the "building blocks" (or similar terminology) of more advanced, complex movements; (2) specific categories of skills that compose FMS; and (3) at least one specific example of a FMS. - Source :PubMed

Capillary zone electrophorsis for the analysis of naturally occurring 2-hydroxycitric acids and their lactones.

A simple capillary zone electrophoresis method with direct ultraviolet detection has been developed for the analysis of naturally occurring diastereomeric 2-hydroxycitric acid lactones. Using 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer of pH 7, a baseline resolution Rs > 3.0 was observed for all organic acids selected for the present study. This method was employed for the quantitative determination of title acids present in the plant sources namely G. cambogia fruit rinds and H. sabdariffa calyx. Conversion of 2-hydroxycitric acids to their lactones on heating above plant sources is deliberated. Hydrolysis of hydroxycitric acid lactones in aqueous solution is reported for the first time. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. - Source :PubMed

Guidelines for Composing and Assessing a Paper on Treatment of Pain.

Authors, readers, and editors share a common focus. Authors want to publish their work. Readers want to see high-quality, new information. Referees and editors serve to ensure that authors provide valid conclusions based on the quality of information that readers want. Common to each of these roles are instructions to authors. However, these are typically written in an uninspiring, legalistic style, as if they are a set of rules that authors must obey if they expect to get published. This renders the instructions boring and oppressive, if not forbidding. Yet they need not be so, if they are set in context.Instructions to authors can be cast in a way as to reflect common purpose. They can remind authors what perceptive readers want to see in a paper and, thereby, prompt authors to include all necessary information. If cast in this way, instructions to authors are not a set of rules by which to satisfy publishers; they become guidelines for the etiquette of communication between authors and their readers.Against this background, the present article has been composed to serve several purposes. Foremost, it amplifies instructions to authors beyond the conventional technicalities such as headings, layout, font size, and line spacing. It prescribes the type of information that should be communicated and explains the reasons for those recommendations. Doing so not only informs authors about what to write, but also informs readers and referees about what to look for in a good paper. Secondarily, the article publicizes examples of errors and deficiencies of manuscripts submitted to the Journal in the past that have delayed their acceptance and publication, which could have been avoided had the forthcoming recommendations been followed. The recommendations also reprise the elements taught in courses conducted by the Spine Intervention Society in their extended program on evidence-based medicine. Doing so underscores that instructions for authors are not a procedural technicality but a way to ensure that what authors write, what readers read, and what the Journal publishes comply with contemporary precepts of good evidence.Some 20 years ago, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a comprehensive series of articles with a common title: "Users' Guides to the Medical Literature" [1,2]. These articles focused on the science of statistical tests and critical appraisal, and their importance for properly understanding the literature. The present article differs in that it does not presume to teach technicalities. Instead, it describes and explains, step by step, the critical components of an article, what authors should include, and what readers should look for, so that the Journal can ensure that consistent, high-quality information is shared between its authors and readers.The present article focuses on articles concerning treatment of pain, largely because this type of article is more commonly submitted than articles on reliability or validity of diagnostic procedures. Although the present article principally focuses on papers for the Spine Section of the Journal, the same principles, appropriately adapted, serve for other sections. - Source :PubMed

Gentaur adresses


GENTAUR Europe BVBA
Voortstraat 49, 1910 Kampenhout BELGIUM
Tel 0032 16 58 90 45
Fax 0032 16 50 90 45
info@gentaur.com
GENTAUR France SARL
9, rue Lagrange, 75005 Paris
Tel 01 43 25 01 50
Fax 01 43 25 01 60
france@gentaur.com
dimi@gentaur.com
GENTAUR Ltd.
Howard Frank Turnberry House
1404-1410 High Road
Whetstone London N20 9BH
Tel 020 3393 8531
Fax 020 8445 9411
uk@gentaur.com
GENTAUR Poland Sp. z o.o.
ul. Grunwaldzka 88/A m.2
81-771 Sopot, Poland
Tel 058 710 33 44
Fax 058 710 33 48
poland@gentaur.com
GENTAUR Nederland BV
Kuiper 1
5521 DG Eersel Nederland
Tel 0208-080893
Fax 0497-517897
nl@gentaur.com
GENTAUR SRL IVA IT03841300167
Piazza Giacomo Matteotti, 6, 24122 Bergamo
Tel 02 36 00 65 93
Fax 02 36 00 65 94
italia@gentaur.com
GENTAUR bulgaria
53 Iskar Str. Kokalyane,
Sofia 1191
Tel 0035929830070
Fax 0035929830072
sofia@gentaur.com
GENTAUR Spain
Tel 0911876558
spain@gentaur.com
GENTAUR USA
Genprice Inc, Logistics
547 Yurok Circle
San Jose, CA 95123
invoicing/ accounting:
6017 Snell Ave, Suite 357
San Jose, CA. 96123
Tel 001 408 780 0908
jane@gentaur.com